Every civilization has it's myths and the same is true for our civilization as well. The myth and the civilization emerges out of a paradigm and at the same time feeds the paradigm as it develops. The emergence of Modern Science is one of the most significant events in human history. But the religious fervor with which it's story is narrated, taught and propagated is no less apocryphal and at times dramatic, thus falling short of historical authenticity.
One of the ways this tale is narrated is that when human beings in general, but white European men in particular managed to extend their vision beyond their limited being on to the vast recesses of the universe, that is when a new chapter in human history began. The telescope was invented. And so we were taught.
The invention of the telescope changed humankind's perspective of the universe forever. It was probably inevitable that as glassmaking and lens-grinding techniques improved in the late 1500s, in Europe that someone would arrange convex and concave lenses in such a pattern that would bring distant objects near. Makes perfect sense. Just that the picture is incomplete. The existence of expertise in glass making and lens grinding goes well before Europe, and in a different culture- The Islamic World.
Without exception all texts in the English language report that the first person to apply for a patent for a telescope was Dutch eyeglass maker Hans Lippershey. In 1608, Lippershey laid claim to a device that could magnify objects three times. His telescope had a concave eyepiece aligned with a convex objective lens. One story goes that he got the idea for his design after observing two children in his shop holding up two lenses that made a distant weathervane appear close.
But the main figure who gets the big share of the credit of inventing the telescope is the famous Italian Astronomer, Galileo Galilei. Legend has it that news of the 'Dutch perspective glass' reached Galileo Galilei in June 1609, while he happened to be in Venice. In a matter of days, Galileo had designed his telescope without even setting his eyes on one. After making improvements to his initial design, Galileo presented his device to the Senate in Venice. Besides, Galileo is believed to have been the first human being to point a telescope towards the sky thus observing the craters and mountains on the moon and even the Milky Way. Galileo also discovered that Jupiter had moons and the sun has sunspots. 
Interestingly, it's not just restricted to the invention, but Galileo then went on to become the hero of the tale, the father of the Scientific Revolution and the first prophet of the modern scientific age. Even though most of his theories had precedents in the Islamic and Greek world. But collectively all this created a narrative that perfectly fit the scheme, the paradigm and the myth that were needed to define the Modern Western civilization as the culmination and perfection of all previous traditions that rendered the latter obsolete or at least primitive.
Just that this tale has an issue. That, it's just that. A tale !
Sometimes a little bit of common sense along with some knowledge of the historical context can take one a long way in understanding past events. And so we summon it. As we mentioned earlier, European science did not develop in a vacuum. Rather, it drew massively from the Islamic world. So when it came to glass and lens making, Medieval Muslims had great expertise, along with the scientific breakthroughs they made in the fields of geometrical and physiological optics. Ibn al Haytham's books were well known in Europe and translated into Latin very early on. He is often mentioned in early western literature on the subject by Roger Bacon, Robert Grostette, Witelo and he influenced Galileo, Kepler and Newton.  Trade and import of glass products, lenses and other glass products flourished in Italy, Andalus and through Byzantium.  The beautiful stained glass windows in cathedrals across Europe are artifacts of the Islamic influence on European architecture.  Moreover, Astronomy was one of the few sciences that was developed in the early years of the Islamic civilization. Some even date the development of Astronomical sciences before the great translation movement, positing that the translation movement served as an aid for further research, rather than the initial impetus. 
Anomalies encountered in Ptolemy's astronomical models must have created the vacuum needed for the invention of an optical device that unveiled the celestial motion. Keeping all this in mind, it makes perfect sense that if a telescope was invented in the Muslim world, it would land up on the shores of Italy in some time.
Without exception, all English texts on the subject, be it online articles, history of science papers or encyclopedias, attribute the telescope to either Lippershey or Galileo. This is such a widely disseminated myth that even children are subject to it, as textbooks around the world falsely attribute the invention of the telescope to Galileo, branding him the Father of Modern Science. An unbiased study of history shows otherwise.
So let's start with lenses. Scanning through history books on Islamic technology we find extensive mention of the Muslim expertise in lens making, even to the extent of discussing inventions of optical aids, spectacles and other observational instruments. Notable among these are the telescopic shaped observational instrument of Al Biruni , the sophisticated observational devices used in the Maragha observatory that were recreated in Europe.  Even spectacles were invented as early as in the 11th century in the Muslim world, centuries before they showed up in Europe. 
Going from this prowess at designing optical instruments to a fully functional telescope should not be a big leap. Even common sense says that if people are already proficient with creating visual instruments, why should it take 700 years and someone from a different culture to combine lenses in a manner that magnifies far off objects? And so our intuition is right.
Even before Biruni and Ibn al Haytham, another Muslim scientist had already paved the way for the world's first telescope. Welcome Abul Hasan Ibn Ishaq.
Abul Hasan Ibn Ishaq (d. 890), though being a Muslim himself, originally came from a Christian family in Baghdad and was taught several languages such as Greek, Arabic, Aramaic and middle Syriac. He started off cutting glass and working on lenses and suffered weak vision due to staying up late and writing texts and results of experiments. He was one of the translators during the rise of the Dar ul Hikmah movement in which the Abbasids had him and others translating works and used to be paid in gold whatever the weight was of the books he translated. Translators in that time were paid amounts even more than NBA and football athletes today.
Being good with lenses, he created the world's first bifocals. So by the 9th century eye glasses were already invented in the Muslim world. Bifocals are eye glasses with two optical powers. On the contrary, it is widely held that spectacles were invented in 14th Century Europe and Benjamin Franklin invented the bifocals. Both of which are historically incorrect. Then Abul Hasan ibn Ishaq went on to arrange lenses in such a manner that could bring celestial objects close. He succeeded in producing the world's first telescope as early as in the 9th Century, which is seven centuries before Galileo.  Undoubtedly the Islamic civilization was centuries ahead of its time. After observing the solar system through his new invention, he then went on to share his breakthrough with his patron, the Abbasid Caliph, Harun al Rashid. The Caliph, impressed with the device, put it to military use. Thus, Abul Hasan ibn Ishaq's telescope found use as binoculars.
Now some discussion on the original Arabic source that documents Abul Hasan's breakthrough.
There is a massive difference between European texts written before the Crusades and after. The ones written before tend to contain sufficient references back to Islamic sources. But texts during and post Crusades sparingly cite Muslim sources. Is it because of the absurdity of fighting the same people you draw your scientific knowledge from? This trend kept up till the Colonial period. How can you possibly colonize a people and still admit to the strong influence of their science and technology on your own culture? Those two don't fit, hence one has to go. We all know which one was sacrificed. Hence, this was time of the earliest Orientalist texts that launched the most scathing intellectual attacks on not only the religion of Islam, but also the blessed and holy character of the Prophet Muhammad (saw) and the rich intellectual and scientific tradition his followers produced.
Things have changed in the last few decades with the growing interest in studying the history of Islamic Science. But it's still not enough to do justice to the rich scientific tradition that flourished in the Medieval Islamic world.
According to Professor Salim al Hassani, there are five million manuscripts from the Islamic Golden Age in libraries around the world, out of which only fifty thousand have been studied. Only time will tell what new information will be brought to the fore, thus enhancing our understanding of the history of science and the transfer of technology from the Muslim world to Europe. 
Interestingly, the Arabic historical source from which we have derived this useful information about Abul Hasan ibn Ishaq, does not come under the category of veiled manuscripts lying in library shelves waiting to be explored. But from a regular history work. That does tell us how underdeveloped this field is and the attention it requires from scholars and historians, especially Arabic speaking scholarship who would go back to original sources to study the history of Islamic science from the lens of the people who witnessed this period.
The source which refers to Abul Hasan ibn Ishaq's telescope and bifocals is Tarikh Madinat al Salaam written by Sunni scholar, historian, narrator and collector of Hadith, Khatib al Baghdadi. In his 23 volume historical survey on the Medieval Metropolis- Baghdad or Dar us Salam as it was named, he dwells into interesting details on the architecture, design, culture and people of Baghdad at the time.
I am very grateful to Shaykh Abu Ja'far al Hanbali for painstakingly reading through Arabic historical texts and providing us with this eye opening piece of information
A clarification is required here, as this revision of the history of science must not be misunderstood as a mere exercise to determine which culture was more advanced and had a prior claim to the invention. Neither should it be misinterpreted as a clash of civilizations, the ‘Us versus Them’ mentality, usually employed by Western academia in the domain of history. Rather an amendment of this negative ideology is intended.
We live in a world where science has become the hallmark of knowledge and progress. Many thinkers highlight achievements made in their respective cultures with a supremacist mindset. This unhealthy practice was an integral part of the colonial rhetoric, and unfortunately still continues and is a true manifestation of the 'Us vs Them' mindset. A cropped picture of the history of science, where it is presented as a sole proprietorship of the white European man, is not only incorrect and misleading but it represents the subtle forms of racism, sexism and chauvinism that promote violence and abuse at the international level and among individuals. Additionally, it is unhealthy and detrimental for the development of science as well.
Consequently, I have not discussed the development of the telescope in the Muslim world to prove that the Islamic culture was superior to other cultures on account of it's anticipation of modern technology. What made Islam great is not to be viewed from a narrow lens of science. What made Islam great is not the science and inventions that arose, but the culture of learning and devotion and the civilization of ethics, equality and coexistence that its adherents sought to produce. So then why do we need a reconstruction and revision of the history of science at all?
Firstly, it is important to understand the history of science. Plainly for the sake of understanding the history of inventions that shaped our understanding of the world.
Secondly, it would benefit the development of science globally. Its is my opinion that introducing history of science as an elective course in the curriculum for all science related subjects studied at university level, at least in Muslim institutes, would be a beneficial initiative. This way students would get a richer understanding of science as an ever developing and ever revising discipline, and not an absolute claim over reality. Moreover, this would lead to an increase in scientific creativity and reduce the 'Islam vs Science' tension by the formulation of sound Islamic responses to chalenges posed by Evolution AI, Quantum Mechanics, by a thorough survey of how the past Muslim scholars developed different sciences and how they dealt with the road blocks encountered in the combined study involving reason and revelation.
Lastly, it is high time we peel off the colonial supremacist ideology that defiles curriculums around the world. The world has seen enough wars, annexations and abuse of power that owes much to this ideology. The only way to combat this ideology is through knowledge and loads of it.
 Palmieri, Paolo (2001). "Galileo and the discovery of the phases of Venus". Journal for the History of Astronomy.
 Authier, André (2013), "3: The Dual Nature of Light", Early Days of X-ray Crystallography, Oxford University Press,
 Saliba, George (2007), Islamic Science and the making of the European Renaissance, Pg 15-19.
 Suhayl: International Journal for the History of the Exact and Natural Sciences in Islamic Civilization, Vol. 12 (2013), pp. 45-179.
 Al-Baghdadi, Ahmad Al-Khatib, Tarikh Madinat is-Salam, vol.1, pp. 292-436, Dar ul-Maghrib il-Islamic, Beirut, 1422 (AD 2002)
Safiyyah Sabreen studied Mechanical Engineering and is currently pursuing her Master's in Philosophy. She is the Content Director for KNOW. Being interested in the field of Islam and Science and Islamic Eschatology, she produced a documentary on the Golden Age of Islam and directs the Second Golden Age series.